[Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098


Dan Young <dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(dmalcolm at redhat.c
                   |                            |om)




--- Comment #17 from Dan Young <dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us>  2009-10-15 18:42:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> My understanding of the state of this bug is that I'm the reviewer, and that
> I've approved the review, and that whoever is to be the owner is now
> responsible for actually requesting the package import.
> 
> However, looking back over the history, it's not clear to me who the maintainer
> is to be: Ramez or Dan, and thus who's responsible for doing the next steps on 
> this review.  I'm happy to be maintainer or comaintainer of this package, but I
> don't know if that's acceptable within the package review rules.
> 
> Ramez?  Dan?  Do you still want to maintain this package for Fedora?

Aggh, sorry I've been flaky on this. So found on more niggling license issue
while adding the comment #12 additions, specifically that "GPL" is not a valid
license tag (at least rpmlint complains). JQuery appears to be MIT or GPLv2 (no
"or later" that I can find). Would a License tag of "MIT and (MIT or GPLv2)"
work? I'll push the new package out ASAP if Dave signs off. Thanks,

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.