[Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN intergration for the Thunar filemanager
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Oct 17 21:03:36 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465
Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-10-17 17:03:34 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
See Below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
90d1f2d414c2b4b8bf211a8a6b13b358 thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0.tar.bz2
90d1f2d414c2b4b8bf211a8a6b13b358 thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0.tar.bz2.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
Notes:
rpmlint says:
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
The files are a mix of LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+, leaving the package GPLv2+
However, the COPYING file is the LGPL. Might ping upstream about making a
GPL COPYING available instead or in addition to.
Issues:
None.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list