[Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 23 14:30:27 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709


Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tomspur at fedoraproject.org




--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org>  2009-10-23 10:30:25 EDT ---
Some new/different rpmlint output (too long to copy&paste, instead a summary):

- configure-without-libdir-spec
  is ok, because the configure script doesn't support that.

- summary-ended-with-dot A documentation system for C/C++.
  summary-ended-with-dot A GUI for creating and editing configuration files.

- incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.6.1-1 ['1:1.6.1-1.fc13', '1:1.6.1-1']
  epoch is missing in changelog

- spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/page/html/*
- doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/include/html/*
  "find examples -type f | xargs chmod -x" at the end of %build fixes this

- file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/LANGUAGE.HOWTO
  iconv --from=ISO-8859-1 --to=UTF-8 LANGUAGE.HOWTO > LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \
  touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \
  mv LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new LANGUAGE.HOWTO


- wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/tag/html/installdox perl


Not in rpmlint:

It would be better, if you split it examples and put them into a doc
subpackage, because the most space of this package is consumed by examples,
which the less people will watch. With splitting it's up to them to install
them and other people to save space.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list