[Bug 532169] New: Review Request: tzdata-windows2tzid - Maps Windows timezone IDs to the standard TZIDs
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Oct 31 01:32:26 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: tzdata-windows2tzid - Maps Windows timezone IDs to the standard TZIDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532169
Summary: Review Request: tzdata-windows2tzid - Maps Windows
timezone IDs to the standard TZIDs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: oron at actcom.co.il
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tzdata/tzdata-windows2tzid.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tzdata/tzdata-windows2tzid-1.7-1.fc11.src.rpm
-- cut -----------------------------------------------------------
Description: Maps Windows timezone IDs to the standard TZIDs
This package maps Windows timezone names into standard TZID timezone names.
The mapping is extracted from the UNICODE data in:
http://unicode.org/cldr/data/common/supplemental/supplementalData.xml
Installing the package will create the needed symbolic links
in /usr/share/zoneinfo.
-- cut -----------------------------------------------------------
rpmlint results: dangling-relative-symlink -- 91 times.
* rpmlint is obviously wrong:
- All these links point to the actual zoneinfo files.
- These files are contained in the tzdata package
- My package requires the tzdata package.
Legal questions:
* The UNICODE xml data file has no copyright. I packaged the copyright file
from the site -- http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
Is this the correct practice? Are there any other packages containing
some UNICODE data? What do they do?
* It looks as if the copyright allows free distribution of unmodified
copies. Am I correct?
* I wrote the perl script processing the UNICODE data (it's GPL'ed).
Should we split the script and the data files to different packages
(a bit absurd) just because they have different licensing?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list