[Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183





--- Comment #22 from srinivas <srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com>  2009-09-10 11:57:27 EDT ---
sblim-sfcb version 1.3.4 had the following rpmlint errors:
rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec
sblim-sfcb.spec:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-4.fc11.src.rpm
sblim-sfcb.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-sfcb-*
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProviderGz.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcHttpAdapter.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcIndCIMXMLHandler.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInternalProvider.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBasicPAMAuthentication.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcUtil.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcFileRepository.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProviderMem.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInteropProvider.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libcimcClientSfcbLocal.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInteropServerProvider.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcCimXmlCodec.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcQualifierProvider.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBasicAuthentication.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcCertificateAuthentication.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProvider.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcObjectImplSwapI32toP32.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcProfileProvider.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBrokerCore.so
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/sfcb
sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name sfcb
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 21 warnings.

Fixed these warnings and made some changes as suggested by Praveen in comment
#13.

Here's the rpmlint output of the modified packages:

rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec
sblim-sfcb.spec:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server
sblim-sfcb.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line
86)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[root at srini-f11 SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-6.fc11.src.rpm
sblim-sfcb.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server
sblim-sfcb.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 86)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[root at srini-f11 SPECS]# rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-sfcb-*
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

The modified srpm and spec can be found at the following location:

http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcb/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.