[Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 19 18:57:31 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119





--- Comment #7 from Dylan Swift <dylan.swift at gmail.com>  2009-09-19 14:57:31 EDT ---
> Yes, it is. The spec file is completely general, and if you build e.g. a .f11
> srpm on Fedora 10 you'll get out a .f10 RPM.

Aha! Of Course! (somewhere, a light comes on)

So just to clarify, what you're saying is that even if the f10 & f11 SRPMS are
identical, there still needs to be two seperate SRPMS, rather than one without
the %{?dist} tag?

That now begs another question - do I need to change this 'review request'
submission from rawhide to Fedora 10, and then submit another for Fedora 11?

> Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed?  

I do now, thanks. That has sorted it out.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list