[Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 19 18:57:31 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119
--- Comment #7 from Dylan Swift <dylan.swift at gmail.com> 2009-09-19 14:57:31 EDT ---
> Yes, it is. The spec file is completely general, and if you build e.g. a .f11
> srpm on Fedora 10 you'll get out a .f10 RPM.
Aha! Of Course! (somewhere, a light comes on)
So just to clarify, what you're saying is that even if the f10 & f11 SRPMS are
identical, there still needs to be two seperate SRPMS, rather than one without
the %{?dist} tag?
That now begs another question - do I need to change this 'review request'
submission from rawhide to Fedora 10, and then submit another for Fedora 11?
> Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed?
I do now, thanks. That has sorted it out.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list