[Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 29 11:19:22 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786
--- Comment #6 from Naoki IIMURA <naoki at getpopfile.org> 2009-09-29 07:19:20 EDT ---
Thanks for another comments.
> Almost okay.
Thank you for reviewing.
> * Documents directory
> - Usually documents (like "license" text) should be installed
> under %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}.
OK. I've moved three document files (license and two changelogs) to
the appropriate directory.
> ! Note
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> %files
> %doc license
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> will do this automatically.
Thanks for the information.
> * Empty scriptlets
> - Please remove %pre stage completely. Currently %pre stage
> essentially does nothing, however leaving this calls
> unneeded shell process (however Fedora suggests to leave
> %build stage even if this is empty)
OK. Done.
> * logrotate file
> - rpmlint says:
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> popfile.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/popfile
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Please consider to create logrotate file (not a blocker).
POPFile has its own log rotation feature.
It checks log directory per hour and removes log file which is older
than three days before.
The new SPEC and SRPM files:
SPEC URL:
http://getpopfile.org/browser/trunk/linux/fedora/popfile.spec?format=raw
SRPM URL: http://getpopfile.org/downloads/popfile-1.1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm
And here's the full changes between release 2 and 3:
http://getpopfile.org/changeset/3620/trunk/linux/fedora/popfile.spec
Naoki
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list