[Fedora-packaging] blocking kmdl adoption at all costs?

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Tue Aug 8 06:12:53 UTC 2006


Axel Thimm schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:40:51AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Axel Thimm schrieb:
> <rant>
> Did I mention that resitance is futile? This is the umpteenth attempt
> to find something to block kmdl adoption, that I need to argue
> against. If I would had put that energy into something else I would
> probably had solved the TOE by now.
>
> Possibly my attempts to get a sane kernel module packaging scheme is
> futile ...
> </rant>

You are in the packaging committee, I'm not. If you convince the others 
in the committee that throwing away the current standard (that will be 
used in RHEL5 afaics) and that going "back" to something that's similar 
to the stuff we used in fedora.us/lvn is a good thing -> go ahead.

CU
thl




More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list