[Fedora-packaging] Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws

[seth vidal]

On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 08:08 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:

> Now, I don't really want to take any sides in this, I just want the dang 
> thing to be decided one way or the other so we can move on to refining our 
> plugins, as plugins are required in both schemes to be correctly handled 
> in all cases. From experience I know the unamer-in-name works quite nicely 
> but has it quirks from user POV [1], OTOH the kmod scheme (currently used 
> by livna) also seems to work just fine, at least it hasn't bitten me yet 
> although I haven't used any plugins to handle it.

+1

I was not taking a side in it. I was just explaining about what has
worked about the kmod scheme in the past.

I'd just like one or the other, ultimately, please, for the love of all
that's good and holy. :)

-sv