[Fedora-packaging] Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:02:35AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 16:06 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Yes, there exists a yum-plugin already that handles it. But we
> > would need something for up2date/RHEL5 too in case the ABI breaks
> > -- I suspect that's to late.

Just FYI the kernel api/abi between RHEL4U3 and RHEL4U4 broke again at
least in the wireless extensions submodule. I don't think that this
will be different with RHEL5U<N> --> U<N+1> updates.

> up2date/rhel5 isn't an issue.
> 
> rhel5 is basing off of yum - like fedora is. So the plugins available
> here can be used there, too.

That's good news. Does that mean that yum has rhn support?

I started shipping the kmdl plugin to ATrpms' users, but would prefer
it to get into yum-utils as a subpackage. If approved should I send
you a patch for CVS and one for the specfile?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060814/0bbad281/attachment.sig>