[Fedora-packaging] Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Aug 15 12:56:13 UTC 2006
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:48:05PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 14:34 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > An argument against adopting kmdls presented by Thorsten Leemhuis is
> > that
> >
> > * it's too late now to fix it, we should live on with kmod bugs for
> > RHEL5's life-cycle (ending 2012 ...)
> >
> > * too many packages for kmod are written (but actually there is only one
> > in Fedora Extras 5, the rest is pending or in other repos and if
> > other repos count, then ATrpms has several dozens of kmdls :)
>
> I think this argument is invalid. We should ban _all_ module packages
> from Core and Extras anyway.
That's a valid viewpoint. Assuming Fedora Core/Extras indeed bans all
external kernel module packages, does it have the authority/interest
to maintain a kernel module packaging guide? If not who should?
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060815/49bf7860/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list