[Fedora-packaging] Re: atrpms kernel modules

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Tom 'spot' Callaway schrieb:
> [...]
> I'll defer to Thorsten and Axel on this one, since they've been knee
> deep in this.

scop should be asked, too. He's probably knee deep (or even deeper) into
this, too.

> If BOTH of you agree that the _ONLY_ way to have sane
> kernel module packages (without making rpm changes) is to overload Name,
> then I'll withdraw my objection to it. (I know Axel feels that way, do
> you Thorsten?)

Well, I stick to my opinion that "uname -r" in Name creates some
problems on its own and not worth the trouble.

CU
thl