[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps



On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 01:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The _number_ is irrelevant if the people on the committee are in
> agreement, but things in Core are done differently nevertheless. Inside
> RH, there ought to be an instance of people who review the existing
> Packaging Guidelines and announce whether and where we can make the step
> from "guidelines" to "policies".
> 

Guidelines are policies for new packages.  We haven't yet broached the
touchy subject of mass changes to all existing packages, however we're
doing those piece by piece.  Example fixing the BuildRequires.  Next
could be NEVR or something similar.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]