[Fedora-packaging] License landscape (and question of best pratice)

[Jose' Matos]

On Tuesday 07 March 2006 14:46, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> I'd say, include DESCRIPTION as %doc, and keep License: as simple as
> possible.

  But then we are duplicating that file, since R BUILD command also installs 
it.

  On the other hand that is a very _descriptive_ file. ;-)

  I noticed before that you do the same in your R packages. So we could adopt 
this as the standard practice for R packages. Does this looks like a deal? ;)

  Thank your for the input. :-)

> ~spot
> --
> Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
> Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
> Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
> Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

-- 
José Abílio