[Fedora-packaging] [DRAFT] Post Release Naming/Tags

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 à 14:50 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
> >>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway <Tom> writes:
> 
> TC> I have added a draft for handling Post Release packages.
> 
> It might be worth mentioning what to do when upstream ODs on the
> crackrock and unexpectedly changes to a non-ordered versioning scheme
> in the middle of a sequence.  Something like:
> 
> openssl-0.9.6g
> openssl-0.9.6h
> openssl-0.9.6final
> 
> Epoch is probably the only way out here unless we allow something

Just proves adding any non-numeric part to versions is a bad idea

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20070323/4e1db504/attachment.sig>