[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] fortran .mod files

On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 14:23 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 19:55 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 10:18:42AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> > > 
> > > So, I think that if they're searched in the include path, they should be
> > > under the %_includedir. Modules/mod is too vague, but perhaps f90 is too
> > > specific? Wouldn't later fortran modules hit this as well? (f95? 2003?)
> > 
> > Yes, I chose f90 because it was the oldest fortran standard version with
> > these .mod. To be more genereic, maybe
> > 
> > %_includedir/%_lib/fortran
> This seems reasonable to me. Anyone else?

I think we will need some gcc's f90 specialist's opinion.

My gut feeling is, a manually multilib'ed include directory like the one
above (%_includedir/%_lib) can't be right, unless GCC starts to support
searching multilib'ed include dirs (It currently doesn't).

That said, I am in favor of a directory rooted at %{_libdir}, say
or %{_libdir}/f90
or %{_libdir}/gfortran


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]