[Fedora-packaging] Re: Usage of {_libdir} or {_lib} in noarch packages

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 11:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to let rpm set _libdir/_lib to match noarch
> > package requirements?
> 
> What should it set it to? It has no knowledge of where the noarch rpm
> package will eventually be installed. Should we assume that /usr/lib is
> always correct (how Debian of me to even suggest this)?
> 
> ~spot

Also, how does one get this right in the age of noarch subpackages to
arch specific packages?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20081218/3f477bb2/attachment.sig>