[Fedora-packaging] FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Fri Mar 14 04:28:55 UTC 2008
Chuck Anderson (cra at WPI.EDU) said:
> Is there something wrong with the process that pulls in multilib then?
> sane-backends-libs-gphoto2 x86_64 repo deps have been broken for a
> long time due to missing the i386 package in the x86_64 repo. For
> reference, here are the contents of the two packages:
Those aren't in the system directories, so they're not considered.
Only things in /usr/{lib,lib64}, or in a package that contains a
ld.so.conf.d file, are pulled in.
Bill
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list