[Fedora-packaging] Broken dependency /bin/sh?

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 20:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> 
> I believe it is somewhere else because a "grep -Ri broken *" on a cloned 
> repository did not show the "Broken dependencies" subject that the mails 
> should have. I want to suggest to add a check whether or not the amount of 
> broken packages is sane, e.g. up to 100. And in case it is not, the script 
> could add a note to the mail sent to fedora-devel and maybe releng or whover 
> would have to take a look then or only skip the individual reports.

Gah, you're right.  buildrawhide is in releng, but spam-o-matic comes
from mash.

http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=mash

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20080519/d37466d5/attachment.sig>