[Fedora-packaging] wordpress guidelines -- ping?

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 03:25:14 UTC 2009


Ian Weller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:17:59PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Ian Weller wrote:
>>> During the most recent meeting it was decided that I would be contacted
>>> about a few issues with the WordPress plugin packaging guidelines;
>>>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ianweller/WordPress_plugin_packaging_guidelines_(draft)
>>>
>>> I wasn't contacted, but I did ask spot what the issue was, and he
>>> reported that we needed to know if there would be a case where the
>>> plugin may not function on either platform (mu or lack thereof). The
>>> answer is a strong "yes" from upstream.
>>>
>> How do we tell when the plugin doesn't function?  If we can write that
>> down in the guidelines, it will help stop people from using the template
>> to create wordpress and mu plugins when the plugin only works on one
>> platform.
>>
> If it's not in the README for the plugin then it's not likely that you
> can find one small thing to be a whistleblower. The packager would have
> to test it.
> 
> Understanding this, /most/ plugins will work on both platforms.
> 
> This OK to make that clear?
>   https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AIanweller%2FWordPress_plugin_packaging_guidelines_(draft)&diff=94870&oldid=91805
> 
If there's no one thing that makes it clear that something will work
only on worpress or only on mu I guess that's the best we can do.

I'm willing to +1 this.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090402/9a75cea8/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list