[Fedora-packaging] New Draft Packaging Guideline - Fixing Gconf schema registration

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Apr 22 06:50:40 UTC 2009


Shawn Starr wrote:
> Hello everyone, 
> 
> I have created a draft guideline using OpenSuSE's existing macros.gconf2 script for Fedora.
> 
> You can find this at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/GConf
> 
> I have done an initial test with the .spec file mentioned as an example in this draft. Seems to work fine. Since this the first iteration, I would like people to comment so we can get this finalized for Fedora 12 and rejoice in speedy installs and yum updates.
> 

I've added some more comments to the page along with a possibility for
simpler rpm macros that don't use %posttrans since that doesn't seem to
have any speed gains.  Note that I've never coded rpm macros before and
I haven't tested them (gotta sleep sometime):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/GConf#Compare_gconf_schemas

mclasen, would the new macros or something like them be acceptable to you?

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20090421/980d0da2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list