[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530





------- Additional Comments From paul city-fan org  2007-01-03 06:21 EST -------
(In reply to comment #22)
> What's the status on this review?

The thing that was holding it up originally was the license. This has been fixed
by a new upstream release (0.67) which states that it's licensed under the same
terms as perl itself (i.e. GPL or Artistic).

In Comment #21, Robin was going to check whether Bug #73921 and Bug #129724 were
still present before going ahead with owning the package in Extras,

I have created an updated SRPM for 0.67 that brings the package much more into
line with the way perl modules are normally written for Extras. This addresses
the directory ownership issue of Bug #73921.

I haven't checked the status of Bug #129724 but that looks to me more like an
issue for upstream rather than a packaging issue, and I don't think that should
block the package from being imported.

Updated SRPM:
http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-RPM2/perl-RPM2-0.67-1.src.rpm
Updated Spec: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-RPM2/perl-RPM2.spec

Robin, what's the state of play for this package from your point of view?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]