whole pile o' updates

[Luke Macken]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 09:25:16AM -0700, Jake Edge wrote:
> (sorry if this starts a new thread, you folks answered before I had a 
> chance to subscribe :)
>
> Jesse wrote:
>
> > As for ruby-gnome2's other CVE fix, that was released earlier in a
> > different update,
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2007-4216
>
> So this getting into our system is an artifact of how we process the 
> alerts.  Our program looks for CVE references anywhere in the alert and 
> believes the alert fixes those CVEs.  In this case (and presumably others), 
> that CVE was fixed in an earlier release and only appeared in the Changelog 
> in the message.
>
> I have sometimes wondered about those changelogs.  It would seem to me that 
> unless they only refer to the changes since the last release, they are 
> fairly confusing to someone reading them.  Is there a way for a human (or 
> program) to determine which of those changelog entries actually correspond 
> to the changes in the release that goes with the alert?

The changelogs are /supposed/ to be from the last time that package was
updated.  However, there are still some bugs that need to get worked out
in the generation of these.

luke