pam_mount security update

[Tomas Hoger]

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:26:03 +0200 Till Maas <opensource at till.name>
wrote:

> On Monday 08 September 2008 12:23:40 Tomas Hoger wrote:
> 
> > I also did some minor changes to your update requests.  One thing
> > that remains quite unclear with them is why libHX update is
> > included in the same update request.
> 
> The libHX update is included there, because the pam_mount update
> needs the newer libHX library. Afaik both packages need to be in one
> update to make sure they are both synced to the server at the same
> time. LibHX is afaik only used by the upstream maintainer for his
> various projects.

Sure, that's understandable.  I just prefer to have that explicit in
the update notes, so I added it there.

Thanks!

-- 
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team