Fedora and udev
Florian La Roche
laroche at redhat.com
Tue Aug 24 07:30:09 UTC 2004
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 04:49, Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > One option would be to use an ext2 file system on a ram disk for udev.
> > > It would do all the same stuff as ramfs (at a slightly higher memory
> > > cost) and work perfectly with SE Linux.
> >
> > It has a number of other, not really desired side effects as well.
> > 1) Kernel people don't really like ramdisks anymore
> > 2) Doing this requires mke2fs in the initramfs. Bleah.
> > 3) It puts an artificial cap on the size of your /dev that then has to
> > be adjustable. And the cap is related to an overhead of memory usage.
> > This is ugly to get "right"
>
> I agree that ext2 is not a long-term solution to this problem.
>
> However at the moment we have a default configuration that's grossly broken
> with regard to SE Linux. If you upgrade a machine which runs the "targeted"
> policy to rawhide then several important daemons (including syslogd) stop
> working. If you upgrade a machine which runs the "strict" policy then it
> will fail to boot.
>
> If we were unable to get ramfs working in a reasonable amount of time then
> ext2 would be a good option to consider IMHO.
It's nice if people experiment with the ramdisk setup, but given the many
limitations of it I doubt this should be the default setup or something
we encourage people to use.
greetings,
Florian La Roche
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list