systrace + selinux + fedora core 4ish?

Tue Jan 18 07:43:04 UTC 2005

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:36:51 EST, Colin Walters said:

> My opinion is that it is essentially an inferior implementation of much
> of the functionality SELinux provides.  It does have some additional
> features like the dynamic privilege elevation that seem possibly useful,
> but I don't think it makes sense to use systrace just for that.

I admit not having read the Systrace stuff yet.  Are there any features that
SELinux would benefit from implementing similar functionality?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/attachments/20050118/5ec5f2b0/attachment.sig>