senlinux configuration, are you sure it's the right way?
Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh at redhat.com
Thu Mar 31 18:04:55 UTC 2005
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > Also from Red Hat's perspective having policy sources installed
> gives us
>
>> major headaches for support. If users start moving
>> files into/out of unused directories, things are going to start
>> breaking. We don't want some support call because someone decided
>> to try out the latest wizbang policy, and it broke their ABC
>
>
> this can happend now with /etc/selinux directory too...
>
>> Application. Also policy sources requires a full build environment
>> to work.
>> Make, M4, checkpolicy ... On a minimal install machine this is a big
>> overhead.
>
>
> i see, that's a bigger problem:-(((
> so the only solution that package creator should have this enviroment
> and he has to include binary application specific policy in the binary
> rpm. which currently can't be added/loaded into the system (could
> it?). so we have to wait for trsys:-(((
>
The only solution now would be to require policy-sources to be installed
and then add their policy to it.
Dan
--
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list