MCS -- some comments for discussion

James Morris jmorris at namei.org
Mon Nov 7 01:04:17 UTC 2005


On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Gene Czarcinski wrote:

> 2.  As I see it, MCS is "simply" another type of ACL but one which (to me) is 
> a better design (more useable) than the existing ACL capability.  However, 
> whereas I can categorize (protect) both files and directories with ACL, I can 
> currently only categorize (protect) files (not directories) with MCS.  I 
> consider this to be a problem/deficiency.
> 
> Consider that when I create new application files (e.g, with openoffice.org), 
> they will not have a category assigned by default.  This could leave a 
> sensitive file available for others to access.  With directory protection, 
> this could be mitigated.

Yes, inheriting a directory's categories on file creation (only) is 
something we'll probably investigate soon.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>




More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list