postfix, procmail and SELinux - No Go

Marc Schwartz (via MN) mschwartz at mn.rr.com
Wed Jun 21 19:56:25 UTC 2006


On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 14:25 -0500, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 13:57 -0500, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> > Just to be clear, I should leave or remove the mydcc policy?
> 
> Paul,
> 
> I am getting errors when building the dcc and razor policies:

I suppose that these are more correctly "warnings" since they do
build...

> dcc.if:23: duplicate definition of dcc_domtrans_cdcc(). Original definition on 23.
> dcc.if:54: duplicate definition of dcc_run_cdcc(). Original definition on 54.
> dcc.if:76: duplicate definition of dcc_domtrans_client(). Original definition on 76.
> dcc.if:107: duplicate definition of dcc_run_client(). Original definition on 107.
> dcc.if:129: duplicate definition of dcc_domtrans_dbclean(). Original definition on 129.
> dcc.if:160: duplicate definition of dcc_run_dbclean(). Original definition on 160.
> dcc.if:181: duplicate definition of dcc_stream_connect_dccifd(). Original definition on 181.
> razor.if:101: duplicate definition of razor_common_domain_template(). Original definition on 101.
> razor.if:197: duplicate definition of razor_per_userdomain_template(). Original definition on 197.
> razor.if:218: duplicate definition of razor_domtrans(). Original definition on 218.
> 
> The modules do seem to build and install however. 
> 
> I do believe that I answered my own question above, in that the dcc
> policy will not load with the mydcc policy loaded.
> 
> Current status:
> 
> # semodule -l
> amavis  1.0.4
> clamav  1.0.1
> dcc     1.0.0
> myclamscan      0.2.0
> mypyzor 0.2.1
> procmail        0.5.3
> pyzor   1.0.1
> razor   1.0.0

Just a quick note that so far, all seems to be well. 

No avclist msgs since the change in policies to the above.

Want me back in Enforcing mode?

Marc





More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list