Help with SELinux Policy for Usability Study

[Dominick Grift]

On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:04 +0800, Cliffe wrote:

> So I am not sure why opera seams to be unconfined, or if removing the
> permissive line was on the right track. Any advice?
permissive domains can be used to troubleshoot/develop policy, without
exposing the whole system.

eventually, after you've completed the development of your policy , and
before you deploy your policy you should remove the permissive domain.

But in development stages a permissive domain makes it easier to debug
your policy since everything is allowed but would be denials are logged.


> Thank you,
> 
> Cliffe.
> 
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/attachments/20090730/cff28793/attachment.sig>