Reason for the change

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 18:32, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvidal at phy.duke.edu) said: 
> > > Note that "use Red Hat Linux as a base for RHEL" means that
> > > Red Hat Linux will need to remain absolutely stable, so people
> > > don't have to be worried about losing value in Red Hat Linux...
> > 
> > If Red Hat Linux is absolutely stable doesn't that cut into revenues for
> > RHEL?
> 
> It's not stable as in unmoving, it's stable as in not-horribly-buggy.

who do you think RHL(P) is suited for, then?


> > Would community members be given access to vendorsec notices if they
> > were to be maintaining some package?
> 
> This is one of the stickier points that we have to work out for
> external-to-RH maintainership and errata; how to handle embargoed
> security notices.

How does debian get vendorsec access?

-sv