Well supported, reliable NICs for Redhat Linux/Fedora?

[marcos colome]

We are here in order to give our opinions not for
intelectuals arguments. If you want to use a 250Gig
that is okay with me, if you want to spend the money
on a dual Xeon that is okay. I have the same enjoyment
and I do the same job with 20Gig or 250 Gig, with
single processor or Dual Processors., I have tried and
I own all those things that you are referring to, but
I love simplicity and that is my own personal opinion,
I am still driving a 1965 Chevy and my cousin got
killed on a 2003 Porsche 
--- Jesse Keating <jkeating at j2solutions.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sunday 16 November 2003 07:58, marcos colome
> wrote:
> > There
> > are a lot of technologies in the market that we do
> not need, they just
> > complicate our life more, it is like SATA hard
> drives,  I prefer SCSI
> > hard drives.
> 
> Heh, I love comments like these.
> 
> Show me a 250gig SCSI disk this is truly
> hot-swappable.  Oh wait, thats 
> right, it doesn't exist.  Pitty.  Show me a 3u dual
> xeon server that is 
> capable of 4+ TB of hot-swap SCSI storage (all in
> the 3u, no external 
> stuff).  Oh wait, it doesn't exist.  Pitty.
> 
> - -- 
> Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE
> (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team
> (http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
> Mondo DevTeam		(www.mondorescue.org)
> GPG Public Key	
>
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
> 
> Was I helpful?  Let others know:
>  http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
>
iD8DBQE/t7WU4v2HLvE71NURAgzgAKCXIVO4Qh8mIoqvKL7yVf+QnOl6JwCgmDY6
> 9PhYMcaEZGn52BPU0wJuE6o=
> =X0Z7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list