PROFTPD

[Pekka Pietikainen]

On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:29:29AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ronny Buchmann (ronny-vlug at vlugnet.org) said: 
> > > No. We prefer the security history of vsftpd. :)
> >
> > So why not use pureftpd?
> 
> Because we haven't had problems with vsftpd, and it's had both
> a good stability and performance record in our use. (i.e., if
> it isn't broken, don't fix it...)
So the question is, why pureftpd? :-)

Only useful (to me) thing vsftpd doesn't do is SSL/TLS, and I can live
without that, since it's such a beautifully engineered piece of software :-)

-- 
Pekka Pietikainen