Kernel source

Andy Green fedora at warmcat.com
Thu Apr 8 10:57:08 UTC 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 07 April 2004 21:33, Tall Paul wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I have noticed that some of the more recent kernel-source packages have not
> been pre-compiled, where some in the past have been pre-compiled.  I am
> using VMWare and I need to update the VMWare configuration against the
> latest kernel.  The latest kernel-source packages don't seem to have things
> pre-compiled.  Is there a reason for this?

...

> Any thoughts?

I have the same problem today when I try to recook the vmware modules.
Previously this has been working great with the 2.6 kernels thanks to the
guy(s) at

http://ftp.cvut.cz/vmware/

Now I am getting this with .300

What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your
running
kernel? [/usr/src/linux/include]

The path "/usr/src/linux/include" is an existing directory, but it does not
contain at least one of these directories "linux", "asm", "net" as expected.

Hm, it does have net and linux... I made a symlink from asm-i386 to asm,
 then. Now I get:

The path "/usr/src/linux/include" is a kernel header file directory, but it
does
not contain the file "linux/version.h" as expected.  This can happen if the
kernel has never been built, or if you have invoked the "make mrproper"
command
in your kernel directory.  In any case, you may want to rebuild your kernel.

These problems did not happen in earlier 2.6 kernels,

 -Andy

- -- 
Find your answer without waiting for replies....
Searchable list archives at 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&r=1&w=2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAdTAEjKeDCxMJCTIRAnAoAJ9qec/YwDGo0V215GEMHncBytenLwCdG4H4
9ynent4ylRlSt1E5D6dqLtI=
=38ZH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list