[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: x864_64 up2date gone wild.



On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 18:34, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Gene C. writes:
> 
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2004 11:11, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:10:45PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >> > XFree86-libs-4.3.0-42 requires XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-42
> >> >
> >> > I cannot figure out why it's stuck here.  Both XFree86-libs-4.3.0-55 and
> >> > XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-55 were selected for update.
> >>
> >> These two packages are the two i386 packages for XFree86.  Do you have an
> >> i386 update channel with the proper versions of these packages? Though it
> >> does seem odd that the i386 package dependencies resolve on a 64bit package
> >> update... I suppose it is good behavior as far as keeping things in sync,
> >> but technically unecessary...
> > 
> > The FC x86_64 distribution has both the x86_64 and the i386 versions for the 
> > XFree86-libs and XFree86-libs-data packages.You need to make sure that 
> > /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources have both the x86_64 and i386 update repositoies 
> > defined.
> 
> According to http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/fedora/, I should only need:
> 
>     yum updates http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/fedora/x86_64/updates/
> 
> Right now, this directory contains only XFree86-libs-4.3.0-55.x86_64.rpm, 
> and does not have the i386 rpm.

what is the best thing for that page to say?  i'd like to keep the
x86_64 updates stuff complete, accurate and timely.

rob.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]