FAQ, GNOME menus, first questions

[joelbryan]

It's all a matter of finding what your looking for, doing what you
need to do, in a most comfortable way, wherein you will believe that
what your doing is effecient.

KDE has grown to be an advance, mature desktop environment..  There's
just too many things that have been added, I bet you'll find six or
more icons in one application, there's nothing wrong about that? but I
was always lost in KDE, trying to find out what those icons are for?
why do you need those icons for that application, wherein what is
really important is your objective, why'd you run the software...


On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:13:04 -0400, fulko.hew at sita.aero
<fulko.hew at sita.aero> wrote:
> 
> 
> joelbryanster <joelbryanster at gmail.com>@redhat.com on 10/06/2004 08:37:57
> AM wrote:
> 
> > GNOME is classic, conservative and more organized than KDE, which is
> > too contemporary, there's just too many things in KDE that you don't
> > need..
> 
> I see a religious battle a brewin'   :-)
> 
> and IMHO, there are too few things in Gnome that you can configure.  :-(
> but thats my opinion, and it might not be yours... thats OK.
> 
> But like I said... its a religious battle based on personal
> taste.  And if you don't care about this... or that... then
> pick what you like and use it.  You can't teach an old dog new
> tricks, and you can't (or at least not without a lot of pain)
> get a user to switch 'xxx' (apps, window managers, desktop managers,
> editors, etc.)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>