Latest Fedora Core 3 status: kernel testing needed

Fulko.Hew at sita.aero Fulko.Hew at sita.aero
Thu Oct 21 17:11:17 UTC 2004



Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com>@redhat.com on 10/21/2004 12:07:15 PM
commented:

> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 12:02:11PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>  > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:13:33AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > > Because the amount of code changed upstream since your
>  > > last report means this might be fixed.
>  > > Bugs that get no replies doesn't mean no-one is listening.[*]
>  >
>  > It'd be nice if Red Hat would have someone whose job was to be a
Bugzilla
>  > Monkey, to make sure people feel like their reports are valued, to
>  > do triage, and to make sure critical problems don't escape notice.
>
> There are a number of problems. 1) the sheer volume of bug reports
> mean that its probably going to need >1 person doing triage work
> 2) a lot of bugs require context of what changed recently
> (which means unless the triager is also doing some of the work,
>  they won't know)

Ahhh... yeah...
Isn't that the whole point for having Bugzilla?...
  To track the bugs and the fixes.

I didn't think it was intended to be 'black hole' for testers.
It must also be used by the developers...
and the feedback loop needs to be closed.






More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list