Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Nils Philippsen]

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 15:35 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:

> And this assumption is wrong. A signature on a package is absolutely not
> correlated to the quality of it.

That last sentence should read: "Having a Red Hat signature on a package
is absolutely not correlated to the quality of it." -- i.e. we generally
sign all packages "leaving the house", be they Rawhide, beta or final.
Sorry for the confusion this may have caused.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011