NPTL is now the default library for building new programs

Mon Apr 4 08:06:16 UTC 2005

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 08:02 +0200, Szabó Ákos wrote:
> > Does it hurt to do this now? Will such stuff work fine on shipping distros? 
> > What would be the downside of doing this?
> 
> Now I can't use Fedora anymore with grsecurity/PAX patched kernel.

this makes no sense. You aren't running a 2.4 kernel I hope, all 2.6
kernels have full NPTL support.

Can you explain how/why grsecurity or pax wouldn't work with nptl?
(and that sounds like a bug in those things)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050404/b5f150b9/attachment.sig>