Why are software raid devices being renamed?

Alexandre Oliva aoliva at redhat.com
Thu Dec 22 13:02:45 UTC 2005


On Dec 21, 2005, Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 17:35 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> > You're still the *only* person I've seen reporting this.
>> 
>> Not true.

> Indeed, I missed your report in the middle of another bug.

>> It's even been a while since I narrowed the problem I've
>> got myself on 5 different boxes to some change in nash.

> You have?  When?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169059#c47

> If you've actually narrowed it down in some way, please, do tell me
> your findings?

I did, back on Nov 30.  I compared the full contents of a working
initrd.img, created with mkinitrd-5.1.10, with those of one created
with mkinitrd-5.1.12.  The scripts were identical, the device nodes
were identical, everything was the same, except for the nash binary.
And, as the comment says, that's as far as I got then.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list