[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: openoffice



On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 10:52 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 03:44:32AM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > So it's either do a major upgrade (oo1.1.2 -> 2.0) in the middle of FC4, 
> > or put it off till FC5...
> > Or delay FC4 till oo2.0 is released...
> > Did I miss one?
> 
> How about openoffice.org-1.1.2 and openoffice.org2-2.0, both in FC4? :)

that one sucks; you need to parallel install (or "everything" installs
go wonky) and that is not an easy thing for big packages like OOo. Far
better to spend the time that would take on getting 2.0 out faster ;)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]