<4> post_create: setxatter failed

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 03:04 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2005, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >I'm not using just the number. I'm using the criticality of the bugs. Eg 
> > >showstoppers.
> > >Would _you_ seriously deploy FC4T3+selinux in a corporate production 
> > >server right now?
> > It wasnt clear to me that you were talking about SELinux specifically in 
> > the test releases. Test releases by design are not fit for production, 
> > let alone SELinux in it. Of course I wouldnt suggest doing that
> 
> Ok, would you recommend FC3+selinux in a corporate production environment 
> then?

I'd not recommend FC<anything> in a corporate production environment,
I'd recommend RHEL for such environments.
(and yes RHEL4 has selinux enabled by default)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20050523/ae01b1f5/attachment.sig>