Firefox - why is it better?

[Rodd Clarkson]

On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 01:49 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:43:48AM +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> > > On Atari ST, people _paid_ for commercial alternative file selector
> > > boxes! Some of them were really good. :-)
> > > 
> > > I don't understand what's so hard to get _file_selection_ done right.
> > 
> > Mmmm, maybe you have answered your own question ;-]
> 
> Nope. We were paying as the TOS one sucked so hard and all usable
> alternatives were at least shareware. Not because there were only few
> geniusses who got it right. :-)

That's my point.  If designing a file selector is so easy, why were so
many alternatives available?


R.
-- 
"It's a fine line between denial and faith.
 It's much better on my side"