x86-64 rawhide update obnoxiousness

[Justin Conover]

On 10/11/05, Steve Grubb <sgrubb at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 11 October 2005 08:52, seth vidal wrote:
> > Maybe I should add a routine where:
> > if we're on a biarch machine and we're updating a package for one arch,
> > check for the biarch package and see if it can be updated too.
>
> I think that would be helpful. I cannot imagine anyone wanting to keep
> .i386
> & .x86_64 packages out of sync.
>
> Also, over time packages should become 64 bit clean and a .i386 version
> may no
> longer be required. Is there any way to spot .i386 packages that are no
> longer needed and can be removed? Right now, you have to download 211 MB
> of
> files to update kde. I wonder what is pulling in the i386 packages for
> kde.
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>

You could tail the end of /root/install.log to see what are i386/x86_64
packages.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20051011/a082c453/attachment.htm>