mono? true?

[David Malcolm]

On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:25 -0500, D Canfield wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> >>>
> >> As of last night I was *so* frustrated with fc... particularly 
> >> because my ability to use tomboy comes and goes as core, extras, and 
> >> 3rd party mono packages break and fix each other; having to manually 
> >> apply the sata-suspend patch with every new kernel; and the 
> >> perpetually broken state of gnome-pilot (currently the evo conduits) 
> >> in fc
> >
> >
> > Is Evolution conduits still broken in rawhide?. Do you have a bug 
> > report on this?
> >
> The evolution conduits are not being built (they're turned off in the 
> spec file).  There is a comment in the changelog from a while back 
> saying the conduits were being turned off "for now".  I tried turning 
> them back on locally and they failed to compile.  This has to be 
> something specific to the FC build environment though, as the evo 2.5.3 
> conduits were built (and working beautifully I might add) in the ubuntu 
> beta when I tested it last week. 
> 
> Is it still appropriate to file a bug if the maintainer turned them off 
> intentionally?  I'll happily do anything I can to help nudge this 
> along... not being able to sync my Treo has been the sole reason I've 
> had a windows box sitting next to my laptop at work for the past year.
> 
DC already nudged me about it, but for the sake of the mailing list, the
relevant bug is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175160