FC5T2 and Development issues, observations, and questions
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at redhat.com
Tue Jan 17 18:43:31 UTC 2006
Nathan Grennan wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Kindly enable SELinux and make sure it works rather than disabling it
>> during the test releases thereby ensuring that problems dont get
>> fixed. Reports bugs and post to this list if required. Firstboot
>> stuff is optional. So the installer becomes more streamlined. If you
>> want to change the developer's mind you need to provide detailed
>> reasons.
>
> I have run into too many selinux only bugs to leave it enabled,
> especially with httpd. By it's very nature selinux goes against the
> KISS principle. I understand that part of the point of releasing and
> using test releases is for such testing, but why try to fix what is
> broken by design?
Your two cents I guess. Would like to hear in detail the design issues
and how to fix them taking into consideration the effect of the new
reference policy.
> I have since thought that users could just revert to i386 UP kernels
> if they had to, but on the flip side I have thought of situations were
> SMP only could be a real problem. One example would be a driver a user
> needs that is known to not play well with SMP. Their only recourse is
> to either wait till the driver is fixed, or revert to a i386 install.
Or report the problem and get this fixed.
>> File a bug report.
>>
> Ok, I expected the a developer to come back with an excuse similar to
> the one I have gotten about using partition labels to mount.
Always worth a try.
---
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list