FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Rudolf Kastl]

2006/1/26, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com>:
> On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 19:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> > manually for the test/devel releases  which is limited. If you must use
> > a everything installation on unusual occasions then kickstart is
> > powerful enough to manage that and tons more. If you can work on making
> > kickstart profile generation in a web interface and similar things
> > easier apart from the system-config-kickstart GUI tool I would welcome
> > that. Work is already being done to document kickstart capabilities
> > better in the installation guide.
>
> Requiring kickstart abilities to achieve that is a bit over the top,
> don't you think? I don't think we want to put the hurdles much higher
> than the "yum --exclude=\*-debuginfo\* install \*" if we want people to
> test Fedora Rawhide (and we would effectively do it if we e.g.
> documented the kickstart but not the yum way).
>
> Nils
> --
>     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
>  safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
>  PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>

in my opinion everything install should definitely available since it
helps with testing aswell doesent it?

and generally... we "everything installers" test alot more aspects of
the system. i wouldnt want to see that option removed personally.

just my personal opinion.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl