FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Rudolf Kastl]

2006/1/26, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at mindspring.com>:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Tony Molloy wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 26 January 2006 13:33, Robert P. J. Day wrote:>
>
> > > 2) there is no "cost" or "danger" associated with such a button.
> > > given that you would (theoretically) get *exactly* the same effect
> > > by just selecting all of the visible boxes that are already there,
> > > you simply can't make that argument, so please stop.  you're just
> > > embarrassing yourself.
> >
> > Not quite true, there are lots of packages on the CD's/iso's which
> > are not in any of the package groups which are selectable.
>
> but i could have sworn that jef "no, there's only one 'f' there"
> spaleta was talking about a reorg of the packages so that *all*
> packages ended up in some category.  if some packages would still not
> be categorized then, yes, my point would not be valid and i would
> withdraw it.
>
> rday
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>

Every package should definitely be categorized in my eyes. just my opinion.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl