[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Faster network?



Jeff Vian wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 10:34 +0100, shrek-m gmx de wrote:
On 03.03.2006 09:12, Mike Chambers wrote:

echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_default
echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default
echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max
echo 0 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
echo 1 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
echo 1 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling

why  ">>"   ?
imho this should be  ">"


For me it works with either syntax, but AFAIK the > is the best (and
most universal) choice
> is not more universal than >>. The difference is that >> appends to an existing file while > starts writing the file from the beginning. So if the file you are >:ing to contains
lines you want to keep they will be gone if you do >.

Regards
Uno Engborg

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]