[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Core 5 Status - package signing ?



Bill Nottingham wrote:
Philippe Rigault (prigault oricom ca) said:
Thank you, Jesse, for the explaination.

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:35:06 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:24 -0500, Philippe Rigault wrote:
Sure, only 2442 RPM packages have been rebuilt out of 2442.
Um, no.  These were rebuilt before Test3, and the reason why Test3 took
a while because we wanted to get these built FOR test3 so that they
would get TESTING.
I see, I misinterpreted the fact that all packages have a last modification date of March 6 or after, it is true that most carry the same name as in test3. Most of them have therefore been touch'ed and not rebuild, right ?

They've been signed.
Does that cause the rpm size difference of 160 bytes larger ?
I wondered why many packages are identical in name, but not identical in size.

DaveT.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]